Let the People Pick the President: The Case for Abolishing the Electoral College

 

Let the People Pick the President: The Case for Abolishing the Electoral College by Jesse Wegman

Honest question: What do you really know about the electoral college?  How did it come into existence? Why was it formed? Why was it used to pick the president instead of the popular vote?  How many electors does each state get, and why? Has that number changed since the implementation of the U.S. Constitution?  Why and by how much?  You really don’t know do you?  All you know is that there are people, supposedly, who think it’s a good idea.  When your candidate benefits from the college even if they lose the popular vote, you defend it.  When your candidate loses the electoral college majority while winning the popular vote, you want it abolished.  That’s about it, isn’t it?

Ahhh.   I thought so.

Well, this book will tell you everything you ever wanted to know about the electoral college and there is an awful lot to digest.  Author Jesse Wegman leaves no stone unturned.  He gives us a thorough history lesson as to why it began, and how it’s essentially failed throughout the country’s history.  Essentially, it all comes down to politics.  When politicians in power have something that works for their favor, they don’t want to give it up.  They know the public doesn’t “get it” (see my first paragraph) so they spew a lot of nonsense from soapboxes and the multitudes of minions gladly bow down at the altar of power as always.

The author is not a fan. Being a member of New York Times Editorial Board, critics of this book will cry that he’s biased towards the left, but I didn’t really feel that way while reading.  In fact, he gives examples of how conservatives have benefited over the years.  An example was the 2004 election. George W. Bush won the popular vote by several million votes but had the state of Ohio had just a few thousand votes go the other way, Bush would have been a one termer. 

He uses a lot of math in this book. I mean, a lot of math.  That’s necessary though, and if one has the patience to wiggle through the massive amounts of equations and examples, one really can’t make any excuse to keep this thing in place.  He also dispels a lot of myths. One common myth is that the Electoral College ensures that the smaller states have a say and ensures that the big states can’t dominate the attention of candidates.  Defenders make the mention that Los Angeles county has a larger population than 41 of the 50 states. Yikes.  Well, as the author explains, this phenomenon is due to the migration from rural areas to the urban areas and this didn’t occur until about 1910. So if the electoral college was put into place in 1787, we really can’t use this as an excuse.

We must also remember that when history was still very young for the country of The United States, “voting” was a privilege for very few.  If you weren’t a white protestant male who owned a substantial amount of property, well, you might as well forget it.  So all of the individual states were always bickering for more power.  They all (understandably) wanted the biggest piece of pie possible.  Many concessions and compromises were implemented when the constitution came to be, including the electoral college. Many of these compromises, Wegman argues, are hopelessly outdated; especially the college.

Sadly, I don’t see our present system changing anytime soon.  There are too many things going on behind the scenes and too many in power are always attempting (successfully sadly) to keep the public ignorant. It makes great reading, though, and it adds to the list the many things that happen within the borders of our country that should be changed, but probably won’t since so many people never bother to read history nor study the meticulous nature of how the government operates.

I should also point out that this book was written before the 2020 election.  I’m not even sure why I bring that up since the electoral college had absolutely no precedent in that clown circus at all.  If anything, 2020 proved that if a spoiled rich reality show turd screamed loud enough, his idiotic underlings would believe anything he told them.  So even though Trump lost both the college and the popular vote, all he had to do was spew nonsense that “the election was stolen” and multitudes of morons appeared out of all corners to march behind their satanic messiah.  Of course, Trump DID plot to “steal electors” etc. so I guess you could say that elements of the college can still cause harm if they’re bastardized in a particular fashion.   I’d love to read a postscript by the author concerning 2020.

A great book. I almost wish universities would devote entire semesters to study this subject.  Maybe, just maybe, things might slowly change for the better.