The General: Charles De Gaulle and the France He Saved by
Jonathan Fenby
I can’t ever recall reading a book that started out so
promising, so enrapturing, and yet by the midway point, turned into a
disappointing thud of a clunker. It
might be a tad unfair to blame this sudden reversal of fortune on the author.
Instead, one might concede that the life of the subject matter just became
uninteresting as did the events that surrounded him at a certain point. Still, one wishes that the author may have realized
this as well, and therefore had handled the latter half of the man’s life in
not so quite of a meticulous fashion.
As the title implies, yes, Charles De Gaulle did save
France, and he “saved” it on more than one occasion. For me, the story that was
the most engrossing was the role De Gaulle played in World War II. At the
conclusion of World War II, the story then shifts to De Gaulle’s political life. Sadly, this is where the book became about as
interesting as picking out a pair of socks to wear for the day.
The author treats his subject matter in a fairly balanced
way. He comes across in the author’s view as a positive figure (after all, he
‘saved’ France), yet it makes your head spin how many of De Gaulle’s
contemporaries loathed him. Churchill, Stalin, Roosevelt, Khrushchev,
Truman….none of them had kind words for the man. As we see, however, this is
mainly due to his hard, uncompromising arrogance and such a trait is necessary
because of the circumstances.
De Gaulle’s early life is quickly glossed over – a bit more
attention is focused on his comings and goings during the first world war. He
was quickly made a commander, quickly became one of the first of the wounded,
quickly resumed command and was quickly captured by the enemy and made
prisoner. He then attempted an escape no
less than five times. This stuff is
exciting to read about.
Even better is the transition to World War II. France, the
ultimate victor of World War I is basically so exhausted and fatigued, that
they ignore Hitler and rival Germany as they slowly grow to become the most
fearsome army in modern civilization. With revenge on Hitler’s mind, France is
quickly added to his list of conquests. France capitulates – mainly because
they simply don’t have it in them to fight anymore. The battle scars from 25
years ago are still fresh. Except De
Gaulle. He remains the only key player that refuses any part of the puppet
Vichy government and quickly sets up base in the French North Africa. Although the allies ultimately prevail, the
hawk De Gaulle isn’t allowed to be a major player, and is rather upset when the
U.S. and England basically leave him as a spectator on the sidelines. This is
the case even during the Battle of Normandy (D-Day). De Gaulle simply can’t
fathom this. It is after all, HIS
‘country’. So one begins to see why the
other leaders consider him a burr in the butt.
Again, exciting stuff.
I wish the book would have wound down at this point. After
World War II, the book turns into a giant Wikipedia article with mostly the
everyday comings and goings of the French government. There are brief bits of interesting material
– such as the failures in Algiers and Indochina, but the book focuses too much
on the minutia of the fall of the Fourth Republic, the rise of the Fifth
Republic, etc. Yes, De Gaulle was a
major player, but all of this is simply not exciting stuff. I confess that there were times where I
became so bored, I would basically scan a 50-page chapter in about five
minutes. At least it helped me fall
asleep some nights.
Another minor irritant is that the author simply won’t refer
to his subject as “De Gaulle”. He is
always referring to him by his rank, title, or some other euphemism. It became
confusing when he’s referred to as “The Colonel”, “The General”, and “The Free
French Leader” all in a span of about 50 pages. On a positive note, a fair
amount of time is spent with his immediate family, and De Gaulle does come
across as quite the loving husband and father – especially with his daughter
who suffered from Down’s Syndrome.
Perhaps a reader with a more thorough understanding of the
ins and outs of the French government and its personalities will enjoy the
latter half of the book more than I did.
I still would recommend it, just be prepared to be bogged down rather
heavily during the latter portions.
No comments:
Post a Comment