King and Maxwell by David Balcacci
Those who read David Baldacci knew exactly what to expect as
soon as they saw the title of this book.
Neophytes might be slightly curious. Why would you name a book after its
two protagonists? Isn’t a more
descriptive title about the story necessary?
Well, if you’re a fan, you understand. Baldacci has a lot of reoccurring
characters in his various books. I think the “Sean King and Michelle Maxwell”
books are my favorite. A duo of private
investigators who both used to be secret service agents. He is good looking, athletic, handsome and
single. She is good looking, athletic,
beautiful, and single. Yet apart from an odd uncomfortable innuendo or suggestive
encounter, their relationship is strictly platonic.
While driving one day, the two encounter a scared teenage
boy running frantically in the rain waving a pistol. Being good Samaritans,
they stop and help, and discover the young man has just lost a military father
who has been killed in the line of duty somewhere in the Middle East. Or so he’s told. So King and Maxwell get involved and start to
uncover a labyrinth of lies and deceptions.
Like most of Baldacci’s thrillers, this one takes place in the realm of
the government, and nothing is ever what it seems on the surface. Even the
President of the U.S. is a minor character in this book.
On a macro level, I really enjoyed the book and found the
story to be quite rewarding. When one
digs deep, however, one sees flaws. Baldacci sometimes struggles with writing
things like characters talking to each other. Example: When Sean and Michelle
have simple conversations about anything, they always use each other’s name in
conversation. When friends talk to each
other, they rarely ever do this. So we read Sean constantly saying things like:
“What should we do, Michelle?”
“Let’s get something to eat, Michelle.”
“Take a left turn here, Michelle.”
“What should we do, Michelle?”
“Let’s get something to eat, Michelle.”
“Take a left turn here, Michelle.”
This sounds like a silly complaint, but trust me, it gets quite annoying after a while. Speaking of flawed character descriptions, it also seems a bit unnecessary (and silly) for Michelle to be referred to at times as a “slob”. This trait bears absolutely no relevance on the story. It just seems like every time they get in her car, it gives a reason for Sean to complain about an old banana peel on the passenger seat etc. It just seems forced. It would be different if this trait somehow affected the action and the circumstances, but it really doesn’t.
What really brings this story down a notch is their friend
Edgar. It seems Edgar is a bit of a wiz with a computer and finding out things
via secret computer files that few have access. Anytime there’s a spot in the
story when the author seems to get stuck on how to proceed, he uses the
character Edgar as a cheat to advance the plot. Need to know the president’s
limo route? Let’s call Edgar! He’ll
know! Need to figure out who’s car is
following them? Let’s call Edgar! He
can trace the license plate! And so on.
Without dear old Edgar, our heroes probably wouldn’t be able to have
accomplished much.
No comments:
Post a Comment