Friday, May 12, 2023

Hue 1968

 


Hue 1968 – by Mark Bowden

If you only chose to read one book about the Vietnam War, Hue (pronounced “Hway”) 1968 might be the best choice available. No, the book doesn’t cover the whole war. As the title implies, it focuses on the location of the infamous Tet offensive initiated by Ho Chi Minh and the North Vietnamese.  The event, however, does an accurate job of summarizing the entire war. The battle of Hue was what made most realize that Vietnam was a losing effort. It woke up even the majority of the most jingoistic supporters and turned the tide of, not only the conflict itself, but the public opinion.

What makes this book so endearing (yet depressing) is that Bowden tells the story (literally) down in the trenches. Most of this book doesn’t focus on the bigwigs in power making decisions. Yes, we do read about some of that, but what we mostly read about are personal stories of the young people who were sent to this war with no inkling of what it was even about, and experienced a literal hell on earth. This book cuts deep into one’s emotional core.  The author does such a great job in this aspect that the book would make an excellent movie if it wasn’t such a horrid, discouraging tale. There are so many anecdotes thrown in here that the reader can’t really keep track. That’s not really important though. Each story about each person resonates exactly how it should and make those who never had to experience such a horror be evermore thankful, and evermore appreciative of the hundreds of thousands of people who did have to suffer through so much.

A typical story begins with an American kid who drops out of high school in Anywhere, USA.  With no real prospects for any sort of meaningful future, the kid joins the army. Next thing you know, he’s fighting overseas in a country he couldn’t even find on a map with no knowledge of why the war is even being fought. He finds himself thrown into a company of soldiers that are basically scared kids just like himself.  The events of the war turn these kids into petrified, drug fueled, rabid animals who soon become immune to the senseless killings, death, and destruction that overpower their senses. It’s cliché to say that the lucky ones survived, but after seeing the many scars that would haunt these poor souls for their entire life, one almost feels as though the lucky ones were actually the ones who died. At least their soul could now be at peace.

All of these stories take place immediately before, and during, the Tet Offensive.  Hue was where the main battle took place so this is where all of the action is in this book. It must be said, though, that the main difference between Hue and the stereotypical Vietnam battle is that Hue is in actual city. The houses are actual houses. They have furniture, kitchens, and television sets.  Such accoutrements are a far cry from the typical battle scenes in the jungle surrounded by straw huts and rice paddies that we normally associate with when we think “Vietnam”.  The horrors, the mindset of the enemy, and the cluelessness of the American leaders though, remain consistent.

We read a lot of geography within the city, but the author provides his readers with well-detailed maps so we don’t get too lost when we hear all of the unfamiliar names and locations. Again, though, the “where” isn’t important in this book.  What is important is the “who” and also the “why” which, like the war itself, is never adequately answered.

So who won the battle of Hue?  Again, to adequately answer that question, we must also confess that like the war itself, the immediate answer isn’t really the obvious one; or in this case, the correct one.  Yes, the Americans “won” the battle in effect. After losing the city to the North Vietnamese, they recaptured the city, but what America would learn about this war is that “victory” doesn’t really happen until the enemy totally capitulates, and this is something that North Vietnam never did, nor would ever do.  No matter how many points on the map that one side takes, if the other side keeps throwing in more soldiers, and young American men keep dying, eventually the public back home gets sick and says “enough”. This is essentially what ended up happening.

This seems to be yet another hard lesson that the U.S.A. would have to learn during this conflict. Throughout most of the Vietnam war, we read that General William Westmorland insists that the U.S. is winning, and his main trump card seems to always revolve around casualties and fatalities.  He seems a slave to statistics, and as long as the enemy suffers more losses than his side does, he looks at this as a victory. We now know that such numbers don’t mean anything. Anytime you have over 50,000 soldiers die in a war that never seemed to make any sense nor have clear goals, it’s looked at as a colossal failure; regardless of how many enemy soldiers died in relation to ours.

So Hue was a wakeup call. It finally shifted the opinion of the majority. Before Hue, the opposition of the war was contained to a minority of hippies and left-leaning radicals. Once the story got out (there are a lot of stories in this book about journalists that covered the battle here as well, including Walter Cronkite) however, the tide began to turn.

This book was incredibly depressing, yet such stories are necessary if we truly don’t want to repeat the mistakes of our past. True, since Vietnam, The U.S. has become involved in other worthless conflicts that pretty much yielded the same results.  It’s sad that we haven’t learned from our mistakes, but if you can say anything at all positive about conflicts in places such as Iraq or Afghanistan, it would be that the body bag count wasn’t nearly as high as Vietnam. Small comfort to those who lost loved ones in battle, but we can only hope and pray that there are never again any Vietnams.

Rise to Rebellion

 


 

Rise to Rebellion – by Jeff Shaara

I’ll give credit to the author since he seems to have come up with a genre that is rather unique. It also does seem that many of his readers enjoy his books. I really wish I could add my voice to the consensus, but this is his second “novel” that I have read, and they simply don’t do much for me.  The genre that he is famous for isn’t really historical fiction as some may claim.  There are many authors that fit that mold, and I love many of them – John Jakes, Leon Uris, Edward Rutherford, and Herman Wouk are a few that come to mind. What Shaara does in his books is a bit different.  He takes historical events (usually American wars) and tells the history of the event as if it were an actual story.  All of our main characters are famous historical people.  So if you know history, there’s nothing in these books that really surprise you.

In this case (volume 1 of a 2-volume series) it’s the American Revolution.  Our main characters are such figures as John Adams, Ben Franklin, George Washington, and Thomas Gage.  We see the unfolding events through their eyes. So, yes, there is some story here, but other than the facts and the important events, I really can’t say that any of these stories moved me at all.  Shaara gives good, detailed accounts of such events as The Boston Tea Party, Paul Revere’s famous ride, and the signing of the Declaration of Independence, but it never made me truly enraptured.  Many know the facts of these famous occurrings, but I was left feeling like I really didn’t need all of this extra made-up fluff around said events.  Yes, reading about Paul Revere galloping on his horse warning colonists about the “British are Coming” is told in exquisite detail that makes you feel that you were actually there, but I honestly never cared about “being there”. 

Now, this sounds like I’m being harsh, but my main squabble is that the detailed accounts of these famous events are really all that is here.  I could see, for example, an author like a John Jakes giving a good detail of such an event, but Jakes would never make it a focus of his book.  He would include it as a chapter, maybe, but his focus would be on a well-crafted story about ordinary people who lived during the time. Jakes made me care about the people.  This is where Shaara just doesn’t do it for me. He tries to pepper his history with some “stories” about the famous protagonists but reading about John Adams and wife Abigail moan about their garden for a couple of pages just didn’t do anything for me.

This is the second book by Jeff Shaara I’ve read, and although I liked it much better than the first one (Gods and Generals) I can’t honestly recommend it. This thing was also almost 500 pages in hardback form and it just dragged on too long.  If you want a good story with history as a backdrop, I would recommend any of the authors that I previously mentioned.  If you really want to learn history though, stick with a history book.  There are plenty of volumes that detail the events here, and the American Revolution is a captivating story by itself. We really don’t need to slog through everything than Benjamin Franklin may or may not have “felt” over a multitude of pages.